<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media is NOT about Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.carryonpr.com/2008/07/24/social-media-is-not-about-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.carryonpr.com/2008/07/24/social-media-is-not-about-conversation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.carryonpr.com/2008/07/24/social-media-is-not-about-conversation/#comment-19327</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carryonpr.com/?p=76#comment-19327</guid>
		<description>I did know Symantec is one of your clients but I didn't chose them because they are I chose them because in my opinion they are a good example.

1994 - Norton was probably the greatest AV available, Norton System Tools a great product also.

Fast forward 10 years, people were saying Norton AV and System tools could possibly do more damage to your system than a virus. That is how bloated and how much of a resource hog the Norton programs became.

But after 2005 maybe before, Symantec started listening to what people were saying and I am the first to say that the 2009 version of Norton is a fantastic product.

But one problem Symantec stopped listening. Because while 2009 is a great version of Norton one of the coolest features isn't available in the 64 bit version of Windows, a version of Windows which according to Microsoft sales have tripled and even sold more than the 32 bit version this summer. 

I am not saying that social media is just about the conversation, it's more than just the conversation but I do believe the conversation is a big part of it.

Nor am I saying that companies "just do it", I think that is wrong and I've seen companies just do it and they've done it wrong.

Going back to what you said "It was a wise decision to refrain from conversing with consumers while the Antivirus product was what you describe as crappy, and to then aggressively engage consumers with a well messaged campaign that has clear business objectives once the better iterations were launched."

I think it would of been a better decision to engage the customer have a conversation when the product was at its low point, admit they messed up. Because then they would of fixed it sooner rather than later, and it would of been public knowledge that they were fixing it, and today people who could benefit from the 2009 version of Norton wouldn't be afraid to use it, and people who haven't even tried it wouldn't bash it.

I thank you Paul for allowing me to have this conversation with you, and I hope we can have some more and maybe you will disagree with my post and I will disagree with your reply, but that is what makes social media in my opinion so great. People having more than one view and sharing those views, and while you may not change my mind or I may not change your mind. Someone who reads what you and I have written here can probably see both points of views and decide one way or their other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did know Symantec is one of your clients but I didn&#8217;t chose them because they are I chose them because in my opinion they are a good example.</p>
<p>1994 - Norton was probably the greatest AV available, Norton System Tools a great product also.</p>
<p>Fast forward 10 years, people were saying Norton AV and System tools could possibly do more damage to your system than a virus. That is how bloated and how much of a resource hog the Norton programs became.</p>
<p>But after 2005 maybe before, Symantec started listening to what people were saying and I am the first to say that the 2009 version of Norton is a fantastic product.</p>
<p>But one problem Symantec stopped listening. Because while 2009 is a great version of Norton one of the coolest features isn&#8217;t available in the 64 bit version of Windows, a version of Windows which according to Microsoft sales have tripled and even sold more than the 32 bit version this summer. </p>
<p>I am not saying that social media is just about the conversation, it&#8217;s more than just the conversation but I do believe the conversation is a big part of it.</p>
<p>Nor am I saying that companies &#8220;just do it&#8221;, I think that is wrong and I&#8217;ve seen companies just do it and they&#8217;ve done it wrong.</p>
<p>Going back to what you said &#8220;It was a wise decision to refrain from conversing with consumers while the Antivirus product was what you describe as crappy, and to then aggressively engage consumers with a well messaged campaign that has clear business objectives once the better iterations were launched.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it would of been a better decision to engage the customer have a conversation when the product was at its low point, admit they messed up. Because then they would of fixed it sooner rather than later, and it would of been public knowledge that they were fixing it, and today people who could benefit from the 2009 version of Norton wouldn&#8217;t be afraid to use it, and people who haven&#8217;t even tried it wouldn&#8217;t bash it.</p>
<p>I thank you Paul for allowing me to have this conversation with you, and I hope we can have some more and maybe you will disagree with my post and I will disagree with your reply, but that is what makes social media in my opinion so great. People having more than one view and sharing those views, and while you may not change my mind or I may not change your mind. Someone who reads what you and I have written here can probably see both points of views and decide one way or their other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.carryonpr.com/2008/07/24/social-media-is-not-about-conversation/#comment-19302</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carryonpr.com/?p=76#comment-19302</guid>
		<description>Thanks for weighing in, Michael.  You've identified a great example in HP - a company that participates in social media for business results and does so with above average success (not great but above average).  

That does not, however, mean that HP conversed with consumers for the purpose of having a conversation.  It means HP conversed with consumers to sell more product by deliberately changing the opinion that building your own PC is better.  That's not conversation for the sake of conversation.  That's a marketing strategy.

It is interesting that you would choose Symantec (of all the CarryOn clients) as your target for the last statement, however.  Symantec is a client that wisely remained above the fray while their products went from bloatware to excellent.  In the last 9 months, however, Symantec has launched one of the most aggressive social media campaigns in the software industry and has enjoyed nothing short of miraculous changes in consumer sentiment as a result.  

In that regard, Symantec is a fantastic example of how conversation is not the point of social media... It was a wise decision to refrain from conversing with consumers while the AntiVirus product was what you describe as crappy, and to then aggressively engage consumers with a well messaged campaign that has clear business objectives once the better iterations were launched.

I'm sorry Michael, but companies can no longer afford to live in the "just do it" phase of social media.  Social media is about driving business results.  Not conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for weighing in, Michael.  You&#8217;ve identified a great example in HP - a company that participates in social media for business results and does so with above average success (not great but above average).  </p>
<p>That does not, however, mean that HP conversed with consumers for the purpose of having a conversation.  It means HP conversed with consumers to sell more product by deliberately changing the opinion that building your own PC is better.  That&#8217;s not conversation for the sake of conversation.  That&#8217;s a marketing strategy.</p>
<p>It is interesting that you would choose Symantec (of all the CarryOn clients) as your target for the last statement, however.  Symantec is a client that wisely remained above the fray while their products went from bloatware to excellent.  In the last 9 months, however, Symantec has launched one of the most aggressive social media campaigns in the software industry and has enjoyed nothing short of miraculous changes in consumer sentiment as a result.  </p>
<p>In that regard, Symantec is a fantastic example of how conversation is not the point of social media&#8230; It was a wise decision to refrain from conversing with consumers while the AntiVirus product was what you describe as crappy, and to then aggressively engage consumers with a well messaged campaign that has clear business objectives once the better iterations were launched.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry Michael, but companies can no longer afford to live in the &#8220;just do it&#8221; phase of social media.  Social media is about driving business results.  Not conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.carryonpr.com/2008/07/24/social-media-is-not-about-conversation/#comment-19293</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carryonpr.com/?p=76#comment-19293</guid>
		<description>Social Media is about conversation and no not all conversations end in Goodbye. 

A lot of conversations end with "See ya soon", "Can't wait to see whats next", "I've changed my mind".

Look at companies like HP and AMD who have embraced the conversation, taken the "Goodbyes" with the "See ya soons" and the "I've changed my minds" and have wowed their competition.

Two years ago maybe a little less, you couldn't find a tech related site which would recomend an HP or Dell system to a visitor, most of them would say  "Build your own PC it's better", now because of conversations that did not end in Goodbye these same sites recomend HP or Dell systems. 

A lot of people at HP credit social media for their double digit revenue this past quarter and a lot of people at AMD have listened to the conversation bloggers are having about them to make changes that hopefully will turn their company aound. 

Now lets take a product like Norton Anti Virus, use to be bloat ware and crappy, now a great produt. But because Symantec has not engaged in conversations, people still call it a crappy product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Media is about conversation and no not all conversations end in Goodbye. </p>
<p>A lot of conversations end with &#8220;See ya soon&#8221;, &#8220;Can&#8217;t wait to see whats next&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;ve changed my mind&#8221;.</p>
<p>Look at companies like HP and AMD who have embraced the conversation, taken the &#8220;Goodbyes&#8221; with the &#8220;See ya soons&#8221; and the &#8220;I&#8217;ve changed my minds&#8221; and have wowed their competition.</p>
<p>Two years ago maybe a little less, you couldn&#8217;t find a tech related site which would recomend an HP or Dell system to a visitor, most of them would say  &#8220;Build your own PC it&#8217;s better&#8221;, now because of conversations that did not end in Goodbye these same sites recomend HP or Dell systems. </p>
<p>A lot of people at HP credit social media for their double digit revenue this past quarter and a lot of people at AMD have listened to the conversation bloggers are having about them to make changes that hopefully will turn their company aound. </p>
<p>Now lets take a product like Norton Anti Virus, use to be bloat ware and crappy, now a great produt. But because Symantec has not engaged in conversations, people still call it a crappy product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
